Skip to content
The Research Evidence

What Is the Scientific Evidence for Reiki?

The scientific evidence for Reiki is limited and inconclusive. That is the honest answer. But 'limited' is not the same as 'nonexistent.'

Some studies show Reiki reduces pain, anxiety, and stress better than placebo. Other studies show no difference. The quality of evidence is low. More research is needed.

The scientific evidence for Reiki is limited and of low to moderate quality. The best evidence is for stress reduction, where multiple studies show Reiki reduces cortisol and activates the parasympathetic nervous system. Moderate evidence exists for anxiety reduction, particularly in clinical settings like surgery preparation and cancer care. Limited evidence exists for pain reduction. There is no evidence that Reiki cures any disease. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) states that evidence for Reiki is low quality and inconclusive. More and better research is needed.

Scientific papers and research charts with gentle hands in healing position

Fast facts

Overall evidence

Low to moderate quality

Best evidence

Stress reduction, anxiety

Pain evidence

Limited, low quality

Disease cure

No evidence

NCCIH assessment

Low quality, inconclusive

The State of the Evidence

What Science Does and Does Not Show About Reiki

The scientific study of Reiki is young. The first rigorous studies appeared in the 1990s. Compared to pharmaceuticals, which have decades of large trials, Reiki research is in its infancy.

The evidence that exists is promising but not conclusive. Some studies show real effects. Others show no difference from placebo. The quality of most studies is low.

This does not mean Reiki does not work. It means we need more and better research. The question is not settled. It is open.

Evidence by Condition

A summary of research findings.

  • Stress: Best evidence. Multiple studies show Reiki reduces cortisol and activates the relaxation response. Quality: Moderate.
  • Anxiety: Good evidence, especially for pre-surgery and cancer patients. Quality: Low to moderate.
  • Pain: Mixed evidence. Some studies show benefit. Others do not. Quality: Low.
  • Depression: Limited evidence. Some studies show benefit. More research needed. Quality: Low.
  • Sleep: Limited evidence. Anecdotal reports are strong. Quality: Low.
  • Cancer symptoms: Reiki may help with pain, fatigue, and anxiety. Quality: Low to moderate.
  • Surgery recovery: Studies show Reiki reduces pre-surgery anxiety and may reduce pain medication needs. Quality: Low to moderate.
  • Disease cure: No evidence. Reiki does not cure any disease. Quality: Strong (for absence of evidence).

Reiki Research Evidence by Condition

Quality of evidence and strength of findings.

Bar chart showing evidence quality: stress highest, anxiety moderate, pain low, disease cure none
1

Stress Reduction

Best evidence. Cortisol studies. Parasympathetic activation. Quality: Moderate.

2

Anxiety

Good evidence for situational anxiety. Quality: Low to Moderate.

3

Pain

Mixed evidence. Some studies show benefit. Quality: Low.

4

Disease Cure

No evidence. Reiki does not cure any disease.

The Scientific Evidence for Reiki

A summary of key findings from systematic reviews and major studies.

Moderate

Reiki reduces stress (cortisol)

Scientific Study

Low to Moderate

Reiki reduces anxiety

Scientific Study

Low

Reiki reduces pain

Scientific Study

Strong

Evidence is low quality and inconclusive

Medical Guidance

Strong

Reiki cures any disease

Medical Guidance

Moderate

Effects are due to placebo

Skeptical View

Why Research Is Hard

The Methodological Challenges of Studying Reiki

Studying Reiki scientifically is harder than studying a pill. With a pill, you can give half the participants a placebo that looks identical. Neither the participant nor the researcher knows who got what.

With Reiki, the participant usually knows whether someone is placing hands on them. The practitioner knows they are giving Reiki. Blinding is nearly impossible. This introduces bias.

The placebo effect is also powerful. Any relaxing, attentive touch will reduce stress and anxiety. Isolating the specific effect of Reiki from general relaxation is very difficult.

Despite these challenges, some studies have tried to control for placebo by using sham Reiki (fake hand positions) or distance Reiki (participant does not know if they are receiving it). These studies have shown mixed results.

Key takeaways

  • The scientific evidence for Reiki is limited and inconclusive.
  • Best evidence is for stress reduction (moderate quality).
  • Moderate evidence for anxiety reduction (low to moderate quality).
  • Limited evidence for pain reduction (low quality).
  • No evidence that Reiki cures any disease.
  • Methodological challenges (blinding, placebo) make Reiki hard to study.
  • More and better research is needed.

Frequently asked questions

Is there any scientific proof that Reiki works?

No. The evidence is limited and inconclusive. Some studies show benefits, but the quality is low. More research is needed.

What does the NCCIH say about Reiki?

The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health states that evidence for Reiki is low quality and inconclusive. Reiki should not replace conventional medical care.

Why are there no large Reiki studies?

Reiki is hard to study due to blinding challenges and funding issues. Large, high-quality studies are expensive. There is little incentive for funding.

Does the lack of proof mean Reiki does not work?

No. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. It means we need more research.

What conditions have the best evidence for Reiki?

Stress and anxiety have the best evidence. Pain has limited evidence. No condition has strong evidence.

People also explore

Sources

  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Reiki Research.
  2. Systematic reviews of Reiki studies.
  3. Bronwen and Frans Stiene, The Reiki Sourcebook, 2003.