Skip to content
Medicine and Energy Healing

What Do Doctors Think of Reiki?

Ask ten doctors what they think of Reiki, and you will get eleven opinions. The medical profession has no single view. It has a spectrum.

At one end: doctors who offer Reiki in their hospitals, who refer patients to Reiki practitioners, who have seen benefits they cannot explain. At the other end: doctors who dismiss Reiki as expensive placebo, who worry about delayed medical care, who want evidence.

Doctors' views on Reiki vary widely. Many hospitals, including some prestigious academic medical centers, offer Reiki as a complementary therapy for symptom management, especially for pain, anxiety, and stress. However, most doctors remain skeptical due to limited high-quality evidence. The American Medical Association does not have an official position. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) states that evidence for Reiki is low quality and inconclusive. Many doctors support Reiki as long as it does not replace conventional treatment. Others reject it entirely.

Stethoscope and gentle healing hands representing the intersection of medicine and Reiki

Fast facts

Official medical positionNone. No consensus.
Hospital integrationGrowing. Many hospitals offer Reiki.
NCCIH assessmentLow quality evidence, inconclusive
Skeptical doctorsCite placebo effect, lack of mechanism
Supportive doctorsCite patient benefits, no side effects

A Profession Divided

The Spectrum of Medical Opinion on Reiki

Main takeaway
The Spectrum of Medical Opinion on Reiki

No major medical organization has an official position on Reiki. The American Medical Association has not issued a statement. The British Medical Association has not taken a stance. This silence is itself informative. If Reiki were clearly effective, organizations would endorse it. If it were clearly dangerous, they would warn against it. They have done neither.

OBSERVEWhat to notice

Individual doctors fall into three camps: the supportive (Reiki helps patients and has no side effects, so why not?), the skeptical (Reiki effects are placebo, and patients should spend money on evidence-based treatments instead), and the neutral (I do not know enough to have an opinion).

Medical Perspectives on Reiki

The spectrum of doctor views and the evidence base.

1

Supportive

Reiki helps symptom management. No side effects. Offered in many hospitals.

2

Neutral

Not enough evidence. No opinion. Tell patients to continue medical care.

3

Skeptical

Placebo effect. No plausible mechanism. Evidence is poor. Patients wasting money.

4

Evidence Base

Low to moderate quality. Promising but inconclusive. More research needed.

Evidence scan

What the Medical Evidence Says About Reiki

A summary of how medical research institutions assess Reiki evidence.

ForLimited

Reiki reduces pain and anxiety

Scientific Study

NeutralStrong

Evidence is low quality and inconclusive

Medical Guidance

AgainstModerate

Reiki effects are due to placebo or general relaxation

Skeptical View

NeutralStrong

Reiki should not replace conventional medical treatment

Medical Guidance

Integration into Medical Settings

Which Hospitals Offer Reiki and Why

Many hospitals in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere offer Reiki as a complementary therapy. These include prestigious academic medical centers like Memorial Sloan Kettering, Duke Integrative Medicine, and the Cleveland Clinic.

Why do hospitals offer Reiki if the evidence is limited? Several reasons. Patient demand. Improved patient satisfaction scores. Low cost and low risk. And for some hospital leaders, genuine belief that Reiki helps.

The most common applications in hospitals are for pain management, anxiety reduction, and stress relief. Reiki is often offered alongside massage, acupuncture, and meditation. It is never presented as a replacement for medical treatment.

Supportive vs Skeptical Doctor Views

How doctors on opposite ends of the spectrum see Reiki.

Compare

Evidence base

Supportive Doctor

Promising but limited

Skeptical Doctor

Poor and inconclusive

Compare

Placebo effect

Supportive Doctor

Real and valuable

Skeptical Doctor

Not real treatment

Compare

Patient benefit

Supportive Doctor

Reported benefits matter

Skeptical Doctor

Benefits are imaginary

Compare

Hospital offering

Supportive Doctor

Good idea. Helps patients.

Skeptical Doctor

Waste of resources.

Compare

Bottom line

Supportive Doctor

Safe complement. Why not?

Skeptical Doctor

No evidence. Do not recommend.

Skim first

Key takeaways

The shortest useful version of this page.

  1. Doctors' views on Reiki vary widely. There is no consensus.

  2. Many hospitals offer Reiki, including prestigious academic centers.

  3. The NCCIH states that evidence for Reiki is low quality and inconclusive.

  4. Reiki should never replace conventional medical treatment.

  5. Supportive doctors cite patient benefits and no side effects.

  6. Skeptical doctors cite lack of mechanism and poor evidence.

Frequently asked questions

Do any major medical organizations endorse Reiki?

No. No major medical association endorses Reiki. None reject it either. The consensus is silence.

Why do hospitals offer Reiki if doctors are skeptical?

Patient demand, satisfaction scores, low cost, and some hospital leaders believe it helps. Hospital offerings do not equal medical endorsement.

Can my doctor recommend Reiki?

Some doctors do. Some do not. It is not standard of care. If your doctor recommends Reiki, they are practicing outside mainstream guidelines.

Do cancer centers offer Reiki?

Yes. Many cancer centers offer Reiki for symptom management: pain, anxiety, fatigue, stress.

What does the American Medical Association say about Reiki?

Nothing. The AMA has no official position on Reiki.

People also explore

Sources

  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), Reiki Research.
  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering, About Reiki.
  3. Cleveland Clinic, Reiki Therapy.
  4. American Medical Association, no official position.